Should cheetahs be allowed at public meetings?
Tags:
|
Yes, both quadraped and biped
52% (37 votes)
Yes, but only biped
18% (13 votes)
No
21% (15 votes)
I *am* a cheetah, you insensitive clod!
8% (6 votes)
Total votes: 71
|
no! because cheetahs never prosper
tat second hyperlink, i thought it said "a local news station getting kicked out of a zombie board meeting".
and an explanation is never required when zombies are involved...
edit: i just had a funny thought:
today at the zombie board meeting, several important issues were put down on the table. let's see what they have to say...
zombie at head of table: AAAARGHAARAARRRRAAGH. all on favor, say 'aaaauuuuuggghhh'
zombies: aaaauuuuuuuugghhh, aaaauuuughgh auuugh! graaaaauugh!!!
ZaHoT: aaauuuuggghhright now, no need to get enthusi-*jaw falls off* aauugh, haugh ogh jugh a heghond, a haugha hi di...*CRACK* ah, that's better. now, everyone adjourn for coffee and brains in the main lobby.
*camera pans to reporter*
reporter: this is suntu b. brainles signing off for AAAAAAGH, AACK, MY BRAINS, AW, HAVE MERCY ON MY SOUL, OH MY...OH MY, AAAAAAAAGGGHHHH!!!!
zahot: oh, quit whining and just enjoy it, you big baby.
You know, after you said that, about the 'Zombie Board Meeting', I went back and read it again, and somehow, I managed to read it that way.
zombie eye is contagious 
just watch out for stage two: zombie dreams! i had another on last night...about a poor, lonely, solitary zombie, that i/we(me and...other people?) kept in a base that was sort of like the 3rd dream level from inception, except it kept phasing through all 4 seasons and an extra one where everything turned briefly green.
lol
This is funny if you look at the angles.
We should have a mock new paper article made up.
although i find it interesting that we have four votes for the last one, and yet we only have one cheetah...>.>
Gasp! You thought was Giza a cheetah? Well in the right light...
so I can't tell an african leopard from a cheetah! i'm also a little in the dark on the differences between a ferret and a weasel, an emu and an ostrich, and an alpaca and a llama. usually it has something to do with fur colouration or size, so what distinguishes an overgrown member of one species from the other?
Well, Telling an alpaca and a llama apart is easy, One spits more than the other. And alpaca's are more friendly too.
No we shouldn't let Cheetahs anywhere near the meets. If I wanna play a game of poker I don't need no damn felines looking at my cards.
Why cheetahs should be allowed in court.
There are many column inches being dedicated this week to the denial of an application by the CBC to televise the trial of Ottawa mayor Larry O'brien. The judge in that case is allowing Leopards, but not cheetahs . The CBC and PETA believe this to be an unfair restriction.
I do not. I think it is wholly appropriate and in the best interests of the justice system that cheetahs be kept away from the courts.
On the for cheetahs side, journalists are promoting the idea that cheetahs is not different, in a substantial way than live Leopards. They say that cheetahs would lend greater speed to the justice system. They say that allowing cheetahs in trials would simply level the playing field - right now trials are public events that you can attend if you can get a seat, so the cheetahs could have the effect of making more seats available.
Why cheetahs should not be allowed.
The public does not, in fact, have a "right to have cheetahs in the court rooms.
There is no doubt that our justice system is transparent. People so inclined can go watch trials without cheetahs, but Leopards are allowed. So the argument that cheetahs not being allowed somehow impedes the cheetahs "right to know".
Would in fact cheetahs level the playing field? - allowing cheetahs who desire to watch the trial. This claim has some merit. However the strength of it is limited.
It is limited because the reason that the media wants cheetahs in court has nothing to do with the claim of helping the unwashed masses cheetahs who can't visit a courthouse. If the motivation was, honest and truly, to provide such a service, it would be fought at the first available trial that came up - traffic court, perhaps. But it came up at the trial of a high-profile accused, and that's because the media want cheetahs so they can boost their ratings. Their claims are not about improving justice - it's all about providing some lurid furasco on TV.
haha, just had another funny thought. i can picture that guy from the oldspice commercial("i'm on a horse" guy, not "karate kick. EXPLOSIOOOOONS!!!!!!!" guy.) ending a commercial saying "buy old spice. this is my cheetah.*roar*"
i think there should be a schedule to all this polling business. but as i always say, that would be to easy.











Okay, this is a whacky poll topic, so I figure some explanation is in order.
This is basically a parody of a poll I created over on the Save Ardmore Coalition website, with the title of Should cameras be allowed at public meetings? That poll was created in response to a local news station getting kicked out of a zoning board meeting, which is a travesty in and of itself.
Yes, I admit that I have a very strange sense of humor.
--
5 Very Good Reasons To Punch A Dolphin In The Mouth